SWAT Literature Database for Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles

Title:
fiogf49gjkf0d
Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources 
Authors:
fiogf49gjkf0d
Santhi, C., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Williams, W.A. Dugas, and L. Hauck 
Year:2001 
Journal:Journal of the American Water Resources Association 
Volume:37(5) 
Pages:1169-1188 
Article ID: 
DOI:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03630.x 
URL (non-DOI journals): 
Model:SWAT 
Broad Application Category:hydrologic & pollutant 
Primary Application Category:pollutant cycling/loss and transport 
Secondary Application Category:none 
Watershed Description:
fiogf49gjkf0d
4,277 km^2 Bosque (north central Texas) 
Calibration Summary:
fiogf49gjkf0d
Annual (1962-97) flow r2/E values at Hico = .86/.88 and Valley Mills = .66/.72 ---------------------------- monthly (1993-97) r2/E values at Hico: flow = .80/.79 sed. = .81/.80 org. N = .61/.58 org. P = .71/.70 min. N = .64/.59 min. P = .60/.59 ---------------------------- monthly (1993-97) r2/E values at Valley Mills: flow = .89/.83 sed. = .87/.69 org. N = .60/.57 org. P = .61/.59 min. N = .72/-.08 min. P = .66/.53 
Validation Summary:monthly (1998) r2/E values at Hico: flow = .92/.87 sed. = .98/.70 org. N = .92/.73 org. P = .95/.72 min. N = .89/.75 min. P = .83/.53 ---------------------------- monthly (1998) r2/E values at Valley Mills: flow = .80/.62 sed. = .95/.23 org. N = .71/.43 org. P = .80/.39 min. N = .72/.64 min. P = .93/.81 
General Comments:Study focused on in-depth calibration and validation of SWAT at two sites in the watershed. The resulting r2 and E values indicated that SWAT performed well for both flow and pollutant estimates. A detailed table of calibration parameters is also presented, and extensive graphical results are shown. 
Language:English 
Keywords:watershed management; total maximum daily load; erosion; sedimentation; loading; dairy manure management