SWAT Literature Database for Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles

Title:
fiogf49gjkf0d
Critical review of SWAT applications in the upper Nile basin countries 
Authors:
fiogf49gjkf0d
van Griensven A., P. Ndomba, S. Yalew and F. Kilonzo 
Year:2012 
Journal:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 
Volume:16 
Pages:3371-3381 
Article ID: 
DOI:10.5194/hess-16-3371-2012 
URL (non-DOI journals): 
Model:SWAT-WB & SWAT 
Broad Application Category:review/history 
Primary Application Category:hydrologic assessment 
Secondary Application Category:model comparison 
Watershed Description:
fiogf49gjkf0d
Multiple watersheds reported in previous SWAT studies that are located in Ethiopia or around Lake Victoria in eastern Africa 
Calibration Summary:
fiogf49gjkf0d
 
Validation Summary: 
General Comments: 
Abstract:The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is an integrated river basin model that is widely applied within the Nile basin. Up to date, more than 20 peer-reviewed papers describe the use of SWAT for a variety of problems in the upper Nile basin countries, such as erosion modelling, land use and climate change impact modelling and water resources management. The majority of the studies are focused on locations in the tropical highlands in Ethiopia and around Lake Victoria. The popularity of SWAT is attributed to the fact that the tool is freely available and that it is readily applicable through the development of geographic information system (GIS) based interfaces and its easy linkage to sensitivity, calibration and uncertainty analysis tools. The online and free availability of basic GIS data that are required for SWAT made its applicability more straightforward even in data-scarce areas. However, the easy use of SWAT may not always lead to appropriate models which is also a consequence of the quality of the available free databases in these regions. In this paper, we aim at critically reviewing the use of SWAT in the context of the modelling purpose and problem descriptions in the tropical highlands of the Nile basin countries. To evaluate the models that are described in journal papers, a number of criteria are used to evaluate the model set-up, model performances, physical representation of the model parameters, and the correctness of the hydrological model balance. On the basis of performance indicators, the majority of the SWAT models were classified as giving satisfactory to very good results. Nevertheless, the hydrological mass balances as reported in several papers contained losses that might not be justified. Several papers also reported the use of unrealistic parameter values. More worrying is that many papers lack this information. For this reason, most of the reported SWAT models have to be evaluated critically. An important gap is the lack of attention that is given to the vegetation and crop processes. None of the papers reported any adaptation to the crop parameters, or any crop-related output such as leaf area index, biomass or crop yields. A proper simulation of the land cover is important for obtaining correct runoff generation, evapotranspiration and erosion computations. It is also found that a comparison of SWAT applications on the same or similar case study but by different research teams and/or model versions resulted in very different results. It is therefore recommended to find better methods to evaluate the representativeness of the distributed processes and parameters (especially when land use studies are envisaged) or predictions of the future through environmental changes. The main recommendation is that more details on the model set-up, the parameters and outputs should be provided in the journal papers or supplementary materials in order to allow for a more stringent evaluation of these models. 
Language:English 
Keywords: