SWAT Literature Database for Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles

Title:SWAT discharge response to spatial rainfall variability in a Kansas watershed 
Authors:Tuppad, P., K.R. Douglas-Mankin, J.K. Koelliker and J.M.S. Hutchinson 
Journal:Transactions of the ASABE 
Volume (Issue):53(1) 
Article ID: 
URL (non-DOI journals):https://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp?aid=29503&t=1 
Broad Application Category:hydrologic only 
Primary Application Category:climate data effects 
Secondary Application Category:hydrologic assessment 
Watershed Description:6,316 km^2 Smokey Hill River in west-central Kansas, USA 
Calibration Summary: 
Validation Summary: 
General Comments: 
Abstract:The spatial resolution of input rainfall data affects hydrologic model response and accuracy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of spatial rainfall aggregation on predicted streamflow at five streamgage sites in the 6,316 km^2 Smoky Hill River/Kanopolis Lake watershed in central Kansas. NEXRAD Stage III hourly rainfall estimates were accumulated for 24 h periods for 1995 through 2002. The original NEXRAD grid cells, approximately 4 × 4 km, were aggregated with incrementally coarser spatial scale resolutions of 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, and 256 km. These data along with interpolated ground‐based raingage data were used to evaluate the influence of rainfall input type and spatial scale on streamflow modeled with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model (2000 version). Interpolated ground‐based rainfall data improved daily streamflow simulation compared to the SWAT default method of assigning subwatershed rainfall from the nearest raingage. Streamflow simulation improved further when NEXRAD‐derived rainfall data were input for most of the aggregated grid‐cell resolutions. However, the best model performance was not for the finest (4 km) grid resolution, but rather at resolutions ranging from 32 km to 128 km, depending on the location of streamflow measurement within the watershed. Greater variability in model performance was observed among the five streamgage sites within the watershed than among model runs using a range of aggregated grid‐cell resolutions. These results indicate that greater rainfall spatial resolution for interpolated raingage data or, to a greater extent, aggregated NEXRAD precipitation data has the potential to improve SWAT simulation results compared to the typical use of nearest gage data. 
Keywords:NEXRAD, Resolution, Spatial rainfall variability, SWAT modeling