Title: | Choosing an arbitrary calibration period for hydrologic models: How much does it influence water balance simulations? |
Authors: | Myers, D.T., D.L. Ficklin, S.M. Robeson, R.P. Neupane, A. Botero-Acosta and P.M. Avellaneda |
Year: | 2021 |
Journal: | Hydrological Processes |
Volume (Issue): | 35(2) |
Pages: | |
Article ID: | e14045 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hyp.14045 |
URL (non-DOI journals): | |
Model: | SWAT |
Broad Application Category: | hydrologic only |
Primary Application Category: | calibration, sensitivity, and/or uncertainty analysis |
Secondary Application Category: | extreme low and/or high flows/events |
Watershed Description: | 11,764 km^2 St. Joseph River, 10,978 km^2 Escambia River and 2,448 km^2 Cottonwood Creek, which respectively drain parts of northwest Indiana and southeast Michigan, parts of southwest Alabama and the far western part of the Florida panhandle, and a small portion of northern California, U.S. |
Calibration Summary: | |
Validation Summary: | |
General Comments: | |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | calibration, evapotranspiration, hydrology, model, nonstationarity, parameter, runoff, snowmelt |