SWAT Literature Database for Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles

Title:Assessing the impact of site-specific BMP's using a spatially explicit, field-scale SWAT model with edge-of-field and tile hydrology and water-quality data in the Eagle Creek watershed, Ohio 
Authors:Merriman, K.R., P. Daggupati, R. Srinivasan, C. Toussant, A.M. Russell and B. Hayhurst 
Year:2018 
Journal:Water 
Volume:10(10) 
Pages: 
Article ID:1299 
DOI:10.3390/w10101299 
URL (non-DOI journals): 
Model:SWAT 
Broad Application Category:hydrologic & pollutant 
Primary Application Category:BMP assessment 
Secondary Application Category:tile drainage function development and/or effects 
Watershed Description:125 km^2 Eagle Creek, a tributary of the Maumee River that drains portions of Hancock and Hardin counties in northwest Ohio, U.S. 
Calibration Summary: 
Validation Summary: 
General Comments: 
Abstract:The Eagle Creek watershed, a small subbasin (125 km2) within the Maumee River Basin, Ohio, was selected as a part of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) “Priority Watersheds” program to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) funded through GLRI at the field and watershed scales. The location and quantity of BMPs were obtained from the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service National Conservation Planning (NCP) database. A Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was built and calibrated for this predominantly agricultural Eagle Creek watershed, incorporating NCP BMPs and monitoring data at the watershed outlet, an edge-of-field (EOF), and tile monitoring sites. Input air temperature modifications were required to induce simulated tile flow to match monitoring data. Calibration heavily incorporated tile monitoring data to correctly proportion surface and subsurface flow, but calibration statistics were unsatisfactory at the EOF and tile monitoring sites. At the watershed outlet, satisfactory to very good calibration statistics were achieved over a 2-year calibration period, and satisfactory statistics were found in the 2-year validation period. SWAT fixes parameters controlling nutrients primarily at the watershed level; a refinement of these parameters at a smaller-scale could improve field-level calibration. Field-scale modeling results indicate that filter strips (FS) are the most effective single BMPs at reducing dissolved reactive phosphorus, and FS typically decreased sediment and nutrient yields when added to any other BMP or BMP combination. Cover crops were the most effective single, in-field practice by reducing nutrient loads over winter months. Watershed-scale results indicate BMPs can reduce sediment and nutrients, but reductions due to NCP BMPs in the Eagle Creek watershed for all water-quality constituents were less than 10%. Hypothetical scenarios simulated with increased BMP acreages indicate larger investments of the appropriate BMP or BMP combination can decrease watershed level loads. 
Language:English 
Keywords:best management practices (BMPs); Soil andWater Assessment Tool (SWAT); nutrients; field-scale; Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI); edge-of-field (EOF);Western Lake Erie Basin (WLEB)