Title: | Comparing drinking water treatment costs to source water protection costs using time series analysis |
Authors: | Heberling, M.T., C.T. Nietch, H.W. Thurston, M. Elovitz, K.H. Birkenhauer, S. Panguluri, B. Ramakrishnan, E. Heiser and T. Neyer |
Year: | 2015 |
Journal: | Water Resources Research |
Volume (Issue): | 51(11) |
Pages: | 8741-8756 |
Article ID: | |
DOI: | 10.1002/2014WR016422 |
URL (non-DOI journals): | |
Model: | SWAT |
Broad Application Category: | pollutant only |
Primary Application Category: | BMP and/or cropping system assessment |
Secondary Application Category: | nutrient cycling/loss and transport |
Watershed Description: | 1,293 km^2 Upper East Fork of the Little Miami River, which drains portions of Clermont, Brown, Highland,
Clinton, and Warren Counties in southwest Ohio, U.S. |
Calibration Summary: | |
Validation Summary: | |
General Comments: | The authors state that they used SWAT to assess nutrient transport in response the effects of different BMPs but do not provide any further explanation of how the model was applied (they cite standard SWAT documentation and a "manuscript in preparation" for more information). |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | water treatment costs, source water protection, time series analysis, error correction
model, Ohio, turbidity, avoided costs, polynomial distributed lag model |